<img alt="" src="https://secure.torn6back.com/217076.png" style="display:none;">
The 21st century executive

Optimizing Your Development Process with Engineering Tests

Engineering tests

Software development can be a notoriously complex process. Throughout the development life cycle, engineering tests are essential. When your final product is released, thorough testing processes can ensure it has as few bugs as possible, functions to client requirements, and performs to their expectations.

Who tests your software?

The ability to detect bugs in software depends heavily on how the tests are designed, conducted, and assessed. Testing throughout the software development lifecycle can fall under the purview of software developers, software engineers, software testing engineers, QA testers, QA engineers, and sometimes by users from the client-side (User Acceptance Testing).

Download free eBook: Software Essentials for Business Leaders

According to the American Software Testing Qualification Board, everyone involved in software development should be testing. Regardless of who is doing it, better testing means fewer bugs, which translates to a better product and happier customers.

Popular Software Engineering Tests

Software testing can be split into two broad categories: Functional Testing and Non-functional Testing. Both are critical to improving product success. They help software developers and engineers detect errors in code and areas for improvement. This leads to better code quality and reduces technical debt.

Functional Testing Methods

Functional testing describes testing methods used to validate software components against agreed-upon functional requirements. Simply put, functional tests show what software components do when fed inputs. How accurately they perform determines how successfully they function.

Functional testing usually involves designing multiple test cases, preparing data for testing, inputting the data in a controlled and measured way, and checking the outputs for accuracy. Most functional testing is “black-box” testing, meaning it can be done without any knowledge of the underlying code structures. This helps mitigate confirmation bias that can arise because of proximity to the code.

Popular methods include:

  • Unit Testing
  • Regression Testing
  • Smoke Testing
  • Sanity Testing
  • Integration Testing

Non-Functional Testing

Non-functional testing validates how the software performs against technical specifications. They can include operational specifications and system limitations. These tests are essential for ensuring that software products are responsive and meet client needs for usability and performance.

A few common areas of focus for non-functional testing are response time, user capacity, scalability, reliability, maintainability, usability, and security. Non-functional testing is typically easier to automate and focuses on meeting customer expectations rather than strict requirements.

Common non-functional testing methods include:

  • Performance Testing
  • Stress Testing
  • Load Testing
  • Recovery Testing
  • Security Testing

Balancing testing against development velocity

Engineering tests can add value to the development process in several ways. Traditionally, testing’s primary contribution was ensuring that products were bug-free and ready to ship before deployment. While it’s still popular in the “waterfall” model of development, modern approaches to the software development lifecycle (e.g., Agile and DevOps) have embraced a “Shift-Left” style of early and continuous testing.

The shift towards “testing early and testing often” helps test engineers stay on top of bugs throughout development. Bugs tend to become more costly to rectify the later they are identified in the development process. The earlier they are detected, flagged, and resolved by developers, the more efficient the process becomes.

Engineering tests may seem like the silver bullet to most software issues but beware of over-testing. Testing and resolving issues that arise within development is costly in terms of capacity. Planning time for testing and resolution into product deadlines is a necessary part of optimizing your testing processes.

As software grows in complexity, bug detection becomes more difficult. Ensuring product functionality and performance is important, but it needs to be balanced. This means knowing when to stop.

When to stop testing

Achieving a “zero-bug” state isn’t impossible, it’s just impractical. The aim should be to catch and resolve the defects that could impair software functionality and performance, not to find every single bug. Therefore, it’s a good idea for testing teams to define their exit criteria during the planning stage.

Exit criteria are the markers used to determine whether a specific test activity is completed or not. Defining these early on sets clear guidelines for test engineers. This helps prevent testing from going over budget or missing deadlines.

Test better to Work Better

Engineering tests throughout the software development lifecycle can also provide quality and efficiency metrics vis-à-vis bug detection rates. So, in addition to improving code quality and maintainability long term, engineering tests also help identify areas for improvement in development teams. These can all be leveraged to get better performance out of your development efforts. See how you can get your testers and developers to work more closely together here.

New call-to-action

About the author
Alvaro Marinetto

Working as Foreworth’s, Development Director, Alvaro manages the day-to-day activities of the development team. He helps steer the direction of the company’s new feature development as well as their maintenance efforts.

More info →

What do you think? Leave us your comments here!